The feng shui terminal is soft-locked again. This time by an Indian gal who was using it yesterday (and has not appeared since I stepped into the lab at 10am). Her username is e49138u, meaning her email is u0409138. Go spam her email now for her inconsiderate act!!!
Just felt like rambling
Yesterday, received e-mail wrt my project (another module. I have 6 modules, remember?). The guy was like saying, in the meantime, let’s think of what new device we could discuss on. Basically, the project is split into talking about the technologies went through in the module and another more general part on how one of the technologies is applied. The lecturer mentioned, yes he only mentioned, that one of the good projects he saw talked about a new technology used in a new device. Which brought us to the statement by that project mate.
I wonder why NUS (I’m making a general statement here, cos my contacts have been mainly NUS-ians) students treat lecturers’ words like prophecies from Mohamed. And considering the herd instincts of such people, isn’t it just plain suicide to go along this line, since there will be tonnes of groups who will follow the lecturer’s comments religiously?
It’s one thing to evaluate the mindset of a teacher, and another to follow blindly. One good friend, an old friend in fact, was good in his studies because he always evaluated the situation given by how the teachers spoke. But he didn’t rely just on that. He also searched through past year papers, looked at the syllabus on the whole and decided on what topics would be out for the next exam.
He was almost always right. And in A Levels, I repeated his feat to scrape through my LEP paper.
But these NUS people are just relying on the lecturer’s words. Oh well… I used to give them the benefit of doubt and allowed them to ‘follow their beliefs’, but I always ended up with a B- and less for those modules. It just goes to show that I was right: too many people following the words of the lecturers and only those terribly good ones will survive. I must declare that I am definitely not those kind who can emerge winner in an intense competition.
I compete in niche fields.
Oh well…
giam deprived me of Dr House time last night, and made me think critically for the 1st time in donkey years. In fact, I was so overwhelmed at the amount of thinking and suffering from the withdrawals of House that I was throwing all the medical terms at her every now and then.
Medical history of childhood trauma, epileptic seizures, addiction, whatever.
I hope I wasn’t leading her into insanehood.
And speaking of Dr House, I am really into it. ahaha… I’m turning gay cos I’m loving Dr House le. Or perhaps I’m getting narcissistic cos he and I are almost one entity. Though I find him as detestable as myself, I also find him likeable cos of the resonance I found in him. oh… perhaps that’s why I managed to have friends despite my irritating personality.
For those who seeks better understanding of ME, do watch that. It’s a Knowing zenov Educational Drama.
Back to talking to giam, I think I must make a disclaimer to those who seek me as a crystal ball to knowing guys:
I’m almost always speaking up for the guys.
Don’t believe, ask xy. She almost threw water on me cos I kept siding someone else when she was talking to me and hoping I would sayang her and say, ya… he’s a pig.
Or rather, it’s the difficulty of understanding a gal’s psyche and to convince her of man’s psyche that made me choose the easier path of speaking up for the guys. Come on, I don’t need to think that much by putting myself in a guy’s shoes.
Anyways, I read yesterday that guys are more visual than gals when looking for a partner. Less than half the gal is fine with going dutch on the 1st date, while 80% of the guys expect to pay for all meals.
wow… Once again, I fall into minority again. I believe in dutching. First date, yes, out of courtesy would I pay for all. But hey, I’m looking for a partner, not a life-sucker. Especially if you have a job/qualifications, go feed yourself. This is the New World, I support feminism. Females should be independent.
Point made.
But last night’s talk made me wonder if I’m really that abnormal. Or perhaps I don’t think like guys of my age. I mean, to me, marriage is troublesome. Not the going through of ceremonies, but of the prospect of having kids and stuff like that. It will mean I will have more life-suckers depending on my meagre salary. It will mean a total loss of privacy (cos wives tend to treat desire for privacy as an excuse to fool around). Although I suck at controlling my spending, I don’t see the need to hand my money to a partner (unless she is a financial planner). In fact, I don’t trust women with money more than believing that Earth revolves around the sun.
Whatever.
If only gals would care less and guys would care more… But pigs will fly then. Not exactly a pretty sight.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
oh… adding on to the online garbage… and the real reason why I started this post. haha… forgetful mah…
Anyways, despite going through so many booths, spending so much time, only one company called me. *boohoo!!!* And it was HSBC Financial Planner. The saddest thing is, everybody knows financial planners, insurance agents call EVERYBODY on their lists. Which means technically, I’m still unwanted.